evidoria

What works in Port Moresby

All catalogues · Papua New Guinea profile

13
evaluated practices
56/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 11 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Port Moresby

Port Moresby has benefited from targeted safety and service interventions. The Meri Seif women-only bus service grew from 1 bus serving 21,000 riders in 2014 to 11 buses serving over 600,000 riders yearly by 2019, directly responding to a 2014 finding that over 90% of women and girls had experienced violence on public transport. The Family Support Centre at Port Moresby General Hospital was seeing approximately 15 clients per day before a 2016–17 upgrade added capacity for 12 additional clients daily—over 1,000 more people annually. The evidence demonstrates significant scale-up in violence-response services but does not quantify broader development outcomes across the city.

Drawn from: Papua New Guinea Rural Communications Project · Papua New Guinea National REDD+ Programme — GCF Results-Based Payment · Papua New Guinea's Digital-Accessibility Gap — A 2025 WCAG Pledge Against a 9.5/100 DARE Index Score · Family Support Centres — Papua New Guinea's Hospital-Based One-Stop Model for Family and Sexual Violence Survivors · Meri Seif — Women-Only Safe Bus Service, Port Moresby · Family and Sexual Violence Units - Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary · SevisPass — Papua New Guinea's TECH5-Built National Digital Identity System · SME Access to Finance Project — Papua New Guinea's Risk-Share Loan Guarantee Facility, and Its Overstated Results

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +56 pts 83 here · 28 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +16 pts 94 here · 78 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +11 pts 17 here · 6 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Evaluated outcomes -12 pts 67 here · 79 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -21 pts 17 here · 37 average

Innovation level -24 pts 38 here · 62 average

Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -31 pts 17 here · 48 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Effectiveness -34 pts 33 here · 68 average

Curator validation -40 pts 33 here · 73 average

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
83 · 28
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Documented learning
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Sustainability (ongoing)
94 · 78
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
17 · 6
Transparency, fairness & accountability
56 · 54
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured public value
58 · 57
Transferability / replicability
57 · 60
Governance, certification & transferability
60 · 64
Impact on gender equality
67 · 71
Scalability beyond pilot
56 · 62
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Evaluated outcomes
67 · 79
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
17 · 37
Innovation level
38 · 62
Demonstrated reach
50 · 76
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
17 · 48
Efficiency
0 · 33
Effectiveness
33 · 68
Curator validation
33 · 73

Coloured bar: Port Moresby. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Papua New Guinea Rural Communications Project · 92

Papua New Guinea National REDD+ Programme — GCF Results-Based Payment · 67

Papua New Guinea's Digital-Accessibility Gap — A 2025 WCAG Pledge Against a 9.5/100 DARE Index Score · 64

Family Support Centres — Papua New Guinea's Hospital-Based One-Stop Model for Family and Sexual Violence Survivors · 63

Meri Seif — Women-Only Safe Bus Service, Port Moresby · 63

Family and Sexual Violence Units - Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary · 63

SevisPass — Papua New Guinea's TECH5-Built National Digital Identity System · 60

SME Access to Finance Project — Papua New Guinea's Risk-Share Loan Guarantee Facility, and Its Overstated Results · 57

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more